5 Things CEOs Misjudge About Margin
Overiew
Introduction: The Hidden Danger of “Good Enough” Margins
Most CEOs in the $5M–$50M range obsess over revenue growth. It feels like the ultimate scoreboard. But if you’ve ever wondered why your top line keeps climbing while profit feels flat—or why valuation conversations with investors fall short—the answer is almost always margin.
Margins are the silent driver of enterprise value. They tell buyers how predictable your economics are, how disciplined your leadership is, and how scalable your company really is. Yet most CEOs misjudge them in at least five ways.
1. Confusing Gross Margin, Contribution Margin, and EBITDA
The blind spot:
Ask ten CEOs what their “margin” is and you’ll get ten different answers. Gross, contribution, and EBITDA are not interchangeable. Each reveals something different:
Gross Margin: Revenue – COGS ÷ Revenue. Measures health of your core delivery.
Contribution Margin: Revenue – variable costs. Shows how much cash each unit, project, or client really adds.
EBITDA Margin: Profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization ÷ Revenue. Reflects operational profitability.
Research Insight: Deloitte’s CFO Signals survey (2023) found 42% of finance leaders say their executive teams use margin terms inconsistently, leading to misaligned pricing, hiring, and investment decisions.
Takeaway: When leadership isn’t aligned on definitions, you get fuzzy decisions—and fuzzy outcomes.
2. Underestimating Cost-to-Serve
The blind spot:
On paper, a client or project looks profitable. But factor in scope creep, excess labor hours, travel, rework, or change orders—and the margin vanishes.
Example: A $15M architecture firm assumed one anchor client was highly profitable. A cost-to-serve analysis revealed 18% of staff hours were written off as “overhead” tied to this client, eliminating profit.
Research Insight: Bain & Company’s professional services benchmarks show that firms implementing cost-to-serve analysis improve margin by 4–8 points on average within the first year.
Takeaway: If you don’t measure cost-to-serve, you’re subsidizing clients without realizing it.
3. Benchmarking Against “Average” Instead of “Top Quartile”
The blind spot:
Many CEOs comfort themselves by comparing against the average. But investors and buyers price off the top quartile.
Benchmarks:
Professional Services (consulting, law, architecture): Healthy gross margin = 55–65%. Below 45% = red flag.
SaaS: Gross margin 70–80%+ is considered strong; <65% signals inefficiency.
Specialty Manufacturing: Industry norm is 30–40% gross margin; leaders consistently achieve 45%+.
(Sources: NYU Stern “Margins by Industry” 2023; SaaS Capital Benchmark Report 2022; Bain Services Benchmark 2022)
Takeaway: Being “average” erodes valuation. If you’re not top quartile, you’re leaving millions in enterprise value on the table.
4. Letting Revenue Growth Mask Margin Erosion
The blind spot:
Fast-growing firms often celebrate top-line expansion while margin quietly erodes:
Large clients demand bigger discounts.
Overloaded operations drive unbillable hours.
Leadership assumes volume will cover inefficiency.
Case Example: A $22M SaaS firm grew 30% year-over-year but saw EBITDA margin collapse from 18% → 9% due to low-margin enterprise clients. Their valuation multiple shrank accordingly.
Research Insight: PwC’s 2022 CFO Pulse found 71% of CFOs identified margin erosion—not revenue—as the #1 threat to enterprise value.
Takeaway: If you aren’t monitoring margin alongside growth, you’re scaling problems, not profit.
5. Misunderstanding Margin’s Impact on Valuation
The blind spot:
Owners often throw around rules of thumb—“8x EBITDA” or “2x revenue.” But valuation is less about headline numbers and more about stability and predictability.
Value Drivers (PitchBook, 2023):
Recurring revenue percentage
Gross margin stability
Customer concentration risk
EBITDA growth trajectory
Case Example: A $12M services firm assumed an 8x multiple. Buyers countered at 5x, citing volatile margins and poor reporting. The gap? Nearly $9M lost enterprise value.
Takeaway: Weak or unstable margins don’t just reduce profitability—they slash valuation multiples.
Monthly Margin Discipline Checklist
Action | Frequency | Why It Matters |
Define gross, contribution, EBITDA consistently | Quarterly | Keeps leadership aligned |
Run cost-to-serve analysis | Biannually | Reveals hidden unprofitable clients/projects |
Benchmark margins to top quartile | Quarterly | Measures competitiveness, not complacency |
Review project-level P&L | Monthly | Prevents creeping erosion |
Link margin targets to incentives | Ongoing | Aligns behavior with enterprise value |
Final Thought
Revenue makes you feel like you’re winning. Margin tells you whether you actually are.
If your firm is scaling but profit feels flat, chances are you’re blind to one (or more) of these five traps. The CEOs who build lasting companies don’t just track growth—they install margin discipline as the foundation of enterprise value.
Gross margin vs. contribution margin vs. EBITDA (most CEOs mix them up). Cost-to-serve analysis: which clients/projects look profitable but aren’t. Benchmark: Healthy professional service firms target 55–65% gross margins; below 45% = red flag. SaaS margin benchmarks (70–80%+ gross margin required for strong multiples).
